![]()
Summary of Treatment Fidelity Workgroup
July 20-21, 2000, Washington, DC
Present: |
|
| Al Bellg, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes Medical Center | |
| Belinda Borrelli, The Miriam Hospital/Brown University | |
| Mary Charlson, Cornell University | |
| Susan Czajkowski, NHLBI | |
| Cara Ebbeling, Harvard School of Public Health | |
| Denise Ernst, Oregon Health Sciences University | |
| Robert Heinssen, Miriam Hospital/Brown University | |
| Rosemary Johnson, Oregon Health Sciences University | |
| Melissa Napolitano, The Miriam Hospital/Brown University | |
| Gebenga Ogedegbe, Cornell University | |
| Barb Resnick, University of Maryland | |
| Margaret Chesney, UCSF/Center for the Advancement of Health | |
| 1) | Review of Mission Statement
|
| 2) | Treatment Fidelity Survey PI Responses The group discussed the survey of PI's regarding the site-specific strategies being used to measure and promote treatment fidelity and adherence. The survey documented strategies being used in four areas: i) study design; ii) training of providers; iii) delivery of treatment; and iv) adherence. A summary of PI responses was presented at the BCC meeting in January; however, two sites have not yet responded, and there is a need to update the responses. The following are action items to be pursued:
|
| 3) | Publication Plans The group discussed plans for writing an article or articles which (1) review treatment fidelity methods/measures in the BCC and (2) review treatment fidelity methods/measures in the health outcome literature. A conference call between Treatment fidelity Group members and Ken Lichstein of Memphis State University, who has written on treatment fidelity issues and is involved in the NIA-funded REACH study, was discussed. Dr. Lichstein was enthusiastic about the group's publications plans, and felt that the group could contribute a great deal to raising the consciousness of the scientific community regarding the importance of treatment fidelity issues in intervention studies. Dr. Lichstein takes an approach to treatment fidelity that is broad and focused on more than just the delivery of the intervention. His model involves three components: delivery, receipt and enactment. This model is similar to the model developed by the Treatment Fidelity group, and in fact, the model proposed by the Treatment Fidelity group is actually an extension of Dr. Lichstein's model that includes not only the three elements he proposes (delivery, receipt and enactment) but incorporates study design and training as important components of treatment fidelity. Distinctions between elements of the two
model (e.g., adherence (behavior) versus enactment (practicing cognitive skills)) were
discussed by the group. Margaret Chesney noted the importance of addressing cross-cultural
issues within any model of treatment fidelity (e.g., cultural appropriateness of the
interventions and measurement tools in terms of ethnicity, gender, age, etc.). Dr.
Lichstein has agreed to act as a consultant to the Treatment Fidelity group and will be
invited to speak at the next BCC meeting. |
| 4) | Other Business/Future Plans Ways in which the Treatment Fidelity subgroup can be useful to the BCC were discussed; some ideas in this regard include the following:
A conference call was scheduled for Monday, September 11th at 1:00 p.m. EST to continue discussion of Workgroup activities, including future collaborations and publications. Instructions for accessing the conference call is as follows:
|